|
Post by Ian Rosenberger on Feb 21, 2009 22:42:06 GMT -5
Hey final 3, congrats on making it this far. I am happy for you as I should be if anyone has made it. My vote is still up for grabs but my vote is leaning on one person unless someone impresses me or something. So... Question to all 3 of you... If this game is to have a final 2, and you won immunity, who would you bring along? Explain why you would bring that person and why you wouldn't bring that person.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Rosenberger on Feb 21, 2009 22:43:13 GMT -5
Also, name 2 negative things about your 2 opponents, and also give yourself one single negative word about yourself and explain those. (This question is for all 3 of you as well lol)
|
|
|
Post by Ian Rosenberger on Feb 22, 2009 2:06:53 GMT -5
Bumping...lol
|
|
|
Post by Ibrehem Rahman on Feb 22, 2009 8:57:20 GMT -5
Question to all 3 of you... If this game is to have a final 2, and you won immunity, who would you bring along? Explain why you would bring that person and why you wouldn't bring that person. I would have without a doubt brought Kelly. I spoke to Kelly the most out of her and Sandra so it would've only been fair. I did alot of strategizing with Kelly and out of everyone, we made the most decisions. I could bring Sandra along because she played an easy game but why would I? I talked to Sandra yeah but did she make decisions? No. This game is called 'Survivor' and the title says you should 'Outwit, Outplay, Outlast' and I did. I outplayed everyone on the jury, I outwitted you all and I outlasted you all - hence me being here now and having no votes against me the entire game. You can think I played an easy game but I started off tribeless, I formed a major alliance which turned the game around and I was a HUGE threat during challenges. If them three reasons alone don't stand out then I don't know what will. Negatives about Kelly:- She slipped under the radar which made her float by for half the game. - From what people have seen, she played dirty whilst I didn't. Negatives about Sandra:- She didn't play the game as hard as some other players. - Sandra probably had the easiest time getting to the finals. Negative about me:- I was too trusting at the start of the game. I believed Michelle when she said she had stuff going on in her life and so I voted for her but then she pulled a hidden immunity idol which led to Brady's exit. That's when I changed my gameplan and knew things had to happen. I wouldn't change alligning with her because she's a really fun girl and I do like her. Sorry I didn't answer your questions last night, but I went to bed since it was 4am haha. I hope these are good enough answers Good luck with your decision Ian (that rhymes lol.)
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Feb 22, 2009 9:32:34 GMT -5
It’s no surprise to anyone. I would take Kelly to the final two simply because of the fact that we were aligned since the very first Hera Tribe. As for why I wouldn’t take Ib with me, it would really just be the same reason for why I voted you out – process of elimination. He would be the only other choice.
The bad thing about me is that I got myself wrapped up into too many alliances and put myself in a bad situation where no matter what I did, someone would feel hurt. I could’ve tried harder to combine my alliances so I wouldn’t have had to betray anyone.
One bad thing about Kelly would be that at the very beginning on Hera, I didn’t think she was completely into the game, which almost caused her to be voted out third. I think once we had the tribe swap was really when we saw Kelly with her whole heart into it. The second thing would be that while on New Zeus, Kelly didn’t seem to connect enough with people and she was always being targeted. Even when we were supposed to have a new Zeus alliance at the merge, Cirie suggested voting her out almost every round.
A bad thing about Ib was that it seemed that he started playing very late. The time he left, me and Kelly originally planned and switching next round and going with the flow that round. When Ib came to us we decided to start early since have another vote would make it a lot easier. Also, TBH, I feel like during this questions Ib is kind of taking all the credit for what happened which shouldn’t be the case at all. I do think Ib played a great game, but I think me and Kelly did as well.
(Not part of the question but in response to Ib) I don’t think I play an easy game at all. I would be easy to beat because I’m disliked by the jury, but that doesn’t mean I had an easy game. I worked hard early to make my alliances. And I did make decisions. You only know the last 4 rounds of my game, before which you were the one out of the loop, not me. And I still knew your secret plans. I knew you, Ken, and Kelly had a f3 deal. We thought the tie breaker at f4 would be past votes, and since I had none that counted, we had to make sure you and Ken would vote for me.
Now don’t get me wrong, you played a great game. But I have to defend myself.
|
|
|
Post by Ibrehem Rahman on Feb 22, 2009 12:29:20 GMT -5
None of us are exactly loved by the jury either so that's pretty irrelevant.
I never saw you make a strategical move in the entire game apart from alligning with Kelly/Myself and Ken. That's just my perception of what's happened in the game so that's what I've based it off since we can't know every move eachother has made. I'm sure there are moves I've made that you don't know about. I was out of the loop yeah but I'm the finale - that shows I did alot and I worked hard.
I'm not taking all the credit for it, but I was the one who suggested it and that's all I've said about it. Had I not then none of us would be here and that's the simple truth.
|
|
|
Post by Kelly Goldsmith on Feb 22, 2009 13:40:24 GMT -5
Hey final 3, congrats on making it this far. I am happy for you as I should be if anyone has made it. My vote is still up for grabs but my vote is leaning on one person unless someone impresses me or something. So... Question to all 3 of you... If this game is to have a final 2, and you won immunity, who would you bring along? Explain why you would bring that person and why you wouldn't bring that person. Hey Ian, thanks for the congratulations! If this game was a final 2, I would bring Sandra with me. Like what has been said, we were aligned since Day 1 on Hera Tribe, and I felt obligated the whole time to remain loyal to her, and if the game had a final 2, I still would remain loyal to her. I could not bring Ibe along, simply because my number one ally in this game was Sandra. If I had aligned with Ibe earlier than Sandra, I would've brought him instead of her. Also, name 2 negative things about your 2 opponents, and also give yourself one single negative word about yourself and explain those. (This question is for all 3 of you as well lol) One negative thing about Sandra would be that she made a lot of people angry, and this is pretty evident with Angie's Jury Question. Yes, I do think she played a great game, I think all three of us did. Sandra backstabbed and lied, and I did as well. However, part of Survivor is social skills and other player's reactions and Sandra's actions made other people react badly, most evident through Angie. A second negative thing would be that negativity, because she said that it's kind of obvious she won't win. I personally think she has a great chance, but I often view the glass as half-full, so negativity is just something I try to avoid. My first negative thing about Ibrehem is that I feel a slight sense if cockiness when he answers his questions. I can't argue with the fact that he played a great game, I mean it got him to the final three. I just think that he thinks he did a lot more work than both of us, when I don't think any one of us could say who worked more. If I had to pick another negative thing, it would be how he constantly won Immunities, because with the number of Immunities he won, one could argue that he "hid" behind the Immunity necklace. A single negative word to describe me is "beginning." Although it is not a descriptive word, the beginning of my game was not the best. On Hera and New Zeus, I did not socialized as much as I could, and I just did the Challenges and tried to get by. Sure, I had a few alliances, but I didn't play as hardcore as I did in the merge. Hope that does it Ian!
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Feb 22, 2009 17:48:24 GMT -5
I agree that I don't know everything you did, and you don't know everything I did. We weren't on the same tribe till merge. But I had to have done a lot to have been considered part of the major alliance (although I did feel like I was on the bottom of it, which is why I switched)
|
|
|
Post by Ian Rosenberger on Feb 22, 2009 18:04:03 GMT -5
Thanks guys.
|
|